SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INSURANCE BUSINESS IN THE SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM OF THE POPULATION

Authors

  • Nelia NAGAICHUK
  • Hanna POSOKHOVA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31379/sed.2.5.2025.39

Keywords:

social responsibility of business, insurance business, social protection of the population, sustainable development, social risk management, ESG

Abstract

The article provides a theoretical and methodological understanding of the social responsibility of the insurance business as an effective tool and at the same time an integral institutional element of the social protection system of the population. The relevance of the study is due to the growth of social risks, the limited financial resources of state social security systems and the strengthening of the role of the private sector in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Based on the systematization of domestic and foreign scientific approaches, the evolution of the concept of social responsibility of business is analyzed and a scientific gap in the interpretation of insurance companies as participants in the social protection system is identified. It is substantiated that the social responsibility of the insurer is an inherent characteristic of its activities, due to the economic nature of insurance as a mechanism for managing social risks. The key areas of participation of insurance companies in the implementation of the social protection function are identified, in particular through traditional and innovative types of insurance, microinsurance, preventive measures, ESG investment and corporate social initiatives. It is proven that the integration of socially responsible practices into the activities of the insurance sector contributes to reducing the social vulnerability of households, increasing financial inclusion and forming sustainable models of social development. The results of the study form a theoretical basis for further development of mechanisms for integrating the insurance business into the national architecture of social protection of the population.

It is substantiated that the current stage of digital economy development is characterized by multidimensional and prolonged uncertainty, which has impacted the market interaction paradigm and fundamentally shifted small business priorities. It is demonstrated that communication policy is evolving from a mere sales tool into an instrument for social cohesion and survival. For their local communities, small enterprises are becoming hubs of stability, fostering deep trust through simplified content—a factor that can translate into long-term loyalty. Moreover, social communities serve as platforms for client coordination, enabling collective budget optimization, maintaining authenticity amid uncertainty, and demonstrating business resilience.

The methodological toolkit of the study comprises methods of theoretical generalization, structural-logical modeling, and comparative analysis, which collectively formed the conceptual basis of the research. The empirical base includes analytical and statistical data from international organizations reflecting the global architecture of social media. It is determined that the transformation of traditional approaches to the formation and implementation of communication policy requires a clear civic stance, a shift toward short-term planning, the maintenance of remote connections, and the maximum automation of business processes through artificial intelligence (AI). Under these conditions, communication policy ceases to be a reactive measure to individual challenges and instead becomes a process of business system restructuring.

In this context, digital transformation gains particular significance, moving beyond instrumental support for promotion to take on the role of a systemic factor in adaptive trust management and social resilience, with an emphasis on quality, ethics, and the format of dialogue. Within the social media architecture built on engagement algorithms, a small business’s capacity for rapid communicative transformation under uncertainty becomes its primary competitive advantage. The study establishes the renewed urgency of integrating enterprises into the social structure of networks through personalized interaction tools.

The practical outcome of the research is the development of a functional model for database management, feed algorithms, and video processing, designed to balance consistency and accessibility amidst significant fluctuations in user activity. The proposed approach enables a transition from managing isolated transformation factors to the adaptive management of systemic links. These links determine the functionality of a firm’s communication policy in high-uncertainty environments characterized by algorithmic and demographic shifts, the dominance of short-form video, the creator economy, the integration of generative AI into social media ecosystems, and social commerce. The findings can be applied to develop communication policies for specific social media platforms within the resilience management systems of small businesses oriented toward the integration of digital technologies and AI tools.

References

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. Harper & Row. [in English].

Crowther, D., & Lauesen, L. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of research methods in corporate social responsibility. Edward Elgar Publishing. [in English].

Kotler, F., & Li, N. (2005). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist: yak zrobyty yakomoha bilshe dobra dlia vashoi kompanii ta suspilstva. Standart. [in English].

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77. [in English].

Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 122–126. [in English].

Holme, L., & Watts, R. (2000). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. URL: http://research.dnv.com/csr/PW_tools/PWD/1/00/L/1-00-L-2001-01-0/lib2001/WBCSD_making_Good_Business_Sense.pdf [in English].

Olowokudejo, F., Aduloju, S. A., & Oke, S. A. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and organizational effectiveness of insurance companies in Nigeria. The Journal of Risk Finance, 12(3), 156–167. [in English].

Scholtens, B. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the international insurance industry. Sustainable Development, 19(2), 143–156. [in English].

Okhrimenko, O. O., & Granchenko, E. E. (2018). Social responsibility of insurance business as a tool of international competitiveness. Economy and Society, (15), 616–625. [in Ukrainian].

Baker, T. (2002). Risk, insurance, and the social construction of responsibility. In T. Baker & J. Simon (Eds.), Embracing risk: The changing culture of insurance and responsibility (pp. 33–51). University of Chicago Press. [in English].

Scordis, N. A. (2011). The morality of risk modeling. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 7–16. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0842-7 [in English].

Lesch, W. C., & Brinkmann, J. (2011). Consumer insurance fraud/abuse as co-creation and co-responsibility: A new paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 17–32. URL:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1226-5 [in English].

Ruiter, B. M. (2021). CSR within Insurance Companies in Europe [Bachelors thesis, University of Twente]. University of Twente Student Theses. URL:https://essay.utwente.nl/90977/ [in English].

Szumlicz, T. (2014). Insurance in the social security system. Wiadomości Ubezpieczeniowe, (4), 3–15. [in English].

The Geneva Association. (2022). The role of insurance in promoting social sustainability. URL:https://www.genevaassociation.org/sites/default/files/2022-11/social_sustainability_report.pdf [in English].

Kucherivska, S. (2022). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist strakhovykh kompanii u konteksti tsilei staloho rozvytku. Ekonomika. Upravlinnia. Innovatsii, (2). URL:http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/eui_2022_2_9.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Pan, L. V. (2008). Sotsialno-vidpovidalnyi biznes: perevahy ta obmezhennia. U Derzhavne rehuliuvannia sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva ta sotsialno-vidpovidalnoho biznesu: materialy pershoi mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (s. 93–98). Kharkiv. [in Ukrainian].

Kusyk, N. L., & Kovalevska, A. V. (2013). Efektyvnist sotsialno vidpovidalnoi diialnosti: vzaiemozviazok z investytsiinym klimatom ta pryvablyvistiu. Formuvannia suchasnykh mekhanizmiv rozvytku innovatsiinoi sfery ekonomiky (s. 280–300). [in Ukrainian].

Dluhopolskyi, O., & Oliinyk, D. (2020). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: pryklady rozvynutykh krain svitu dlia Ukrainy. Yevropeiskyi naukovyi zhurnal ekonomichnykh ta finansovykh innovatsii, 2(6), 265–273. URL:https://doi.org/10.32750/2020-0225 [in Ukrainian].

Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: rozuminnia ta vprovadzhennia. (n.d.). Otrymano z URL:http://www.un.org.ua/files/Concept_Paper.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Hrynenko, A. M. (2001). Sotsialna polityka pidpryiemstva: metodolohichnyi aspekt. U Sotsialno trudovie otnosheniya v sovremennikh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh (T. 2). Donetsk: IEP NAN Ukraini. [in Ukrainian].

Stetsyk, A. R. (2011). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist pidpryiemnytstva: sut poniattia. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy. Seriia: Ekonomika, planuvannia ta upravlinnia v haluziakh, (21.17), 268–274. [in Ukrainian].

Nahaivska, D. Yu. (2018). Metodychnyi pidkhid do zabezpechennia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu na rynku prodovolchykh tovariv. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (14), 725–734. [in Ukrainian].

Brych, V. Ya., & Smachylo, I. I. (2014). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist vitchyznianykh pidpryiemstv. Ekonomika i upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom, 5/2(19), 36–39. [in Ukrainian].

Hryshchuk, V. K. (2012). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist (navchalnyi posibnyk). Lviv: Lvivskyi derzhavnyi universytet vnutrishnikh sprav. [in Ukrainian].

Aloni, H. (2008). Etyka biznesu: sotsialno filosofskyi aspekt (Avtoreferat kandydatskoi dysertatsii, spetsialnist 09.00.03). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Chyzhyshyn, O. I. (2016). Znachennia i sutnist sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti v umovakh funktsionuvannia rynkovoi ekonomiky. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo, 6(3), 127–130. [in Ukrainian].

Suprun, N. A. (2013). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist yak chynnyk sotsialnoho zaluchennia (v konteksti tsilei stratehii «EUROPE 2020»). Ukrainskyi sotsium, 2(45), 163–176. [in Ukrainian].

Demchenko, N. V. (2014). Konkurentospromozhnist pidpryiemstva v dzerkali sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu (na prykladi farmatsevtychnoi haluzi). U H. H. Pivnyka (Red.), Sotsialna vidpovidalnist vlady, biznesu, hromadian (T. 1, s. 106). Dnipro: NHU. [in Ukrainian].

Petrunia, Yu. Ye. (2012). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: ukrainski vymiry. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NHU, (1), 7–11. [in Ukrainian].

Melnyk, M. I. (2010). Stanovlennia instytutu sotsialno oriientovanoho biznes seredovyshcha v Ukraini: analiz problem ta poshuk efektyvnykh instrumentiv (Naukova dopovid). Lviv: NAN Ukrainy, Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen. [in Ukrainian].

Okhrimenko, O. O., & Ivanova, T. V. (2015). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist (navchalnyi posibnyk). Kyiv: Natsionalnyi tekhnichnyi universytet Ukrainy «Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut». [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26

How to Cite

NAGAICHUK, N., & POSOKHOVA , H. (2025). SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF INSURANCE BUSINESS IN THE SOCIAL PROTECTION SYSTEM OF THE POPULATION. Society. Economy. Digitalization, 2(5), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.31379/sed.2.5.2025.39

Issue

Section

Mechanisms and technologies of public and business administration